Review



flat bottom 384 well plates  (Greiner Bio)


Bioz Verified Symbol Greiner Bio is a verified supplier  
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
  • 96

    Structured Review

    Greiner Bio flat bottom 384 well plates
    Flat Bottom 384 Well Plates, supplied by Greiner Bio, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 226 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/%CE%BCclear+flat-bottom+plate/Microplate+384+Well+Ps+F-Bottom+%CE%9Cclear/pmc12846741-89-25-28
    Average 96 stars, based on 226 article reviews
    flat bottom 384 well plates - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    96/100 stars

    Images

    Related Articles

    Concentration Assay:

    Article Title: High-content screening for chemical modulators of embryonal carcinoma cell differentiation and survival.
    Article Snippet: Primary and secondary screening assays for compound screening, ntera2 cells were plated at 2500 cells per well of a 96-well μclear flat-bottom plate (greiner Bio-one, stonehouse, UK). each compound was tested at three concentrations (0.1, 1, and 10 μM) and each concentration in triplicate wells. nine wells on each plate contained 0.1% dMso (vehicle) control, and three wells contained 10 μM all-trans retinoic acid as a differentiation control. after 5 days, the cells were washed once with dulbecco’s phosphate-buffered saline (pBs) without Ca2+ and Mg2+ and then fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 min. this was followed by washing the cells and blocking in pBs supplemented with 10% fCs (blocking buffer) for 1 h. Cells were then incubated with ssea3 primary antibody for 1 h, washed three times in pBs, and incubated with an fitCconjugated secondary antibody for 1 h. Cells in at least three wells on the plate were incubated with secondary antibody only, to determine the background fluorescence. nuclei were counterstained with 10 μg/ml hoechst 33342 (invitrogen). images of stained cells were acquired using an automated microscopy platform (inCell analyzer 1000, ge healthcare, little Chalfont, UK). ten random fields were acquired in each well using a 10× objective. images were analyzed using developer toolbox 1.7 software (ge healthcare). the effects of the hits from the primary screen were confirmed by retesting the compounds at a final concentration of 0.1, 1, 2.5, 5, and 10 μM, using the same protocol as in the primary screen. after 5 days, cells were fixed and stained for pluripotency markers ssea3 and oCt4. ten random fields were acquired in each well using a 10× objective. images were analyzed using developer toolbox 1.7 software.

    Control:

    Article Title: High-content screening for chemical modulators of embryonal carcinoma cell differentiation and survival.
    Article Snippet: Primary and secondary screening assays for compound screening, ntera2 cells were plated at 2500 cells per well of a 96-well μclear flat-bottom plate (greiner Bio-one, stonehouse, UK). each compound was tested at three concentrations (0.1, 1, and 10 μM) and each concentration in triplicate wells. nine wells on each plate contained 0.1% dMso (vehicle) control, and three wells contained 10 μM all-trans retinoic acid as a differentiation control. after 5 days, the cells were washed once with dulbecco’s phosphate-buffered saline (pBs) without Ca2+ and Mg2+ and then fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 min. this was followed by washing the cells and blocking in pBs supplemented with 10% fCs (blocking buffer) for 1 h. Cells were then incubated with ssea3 primary antibody for 1 h, washed three times in pBs, and incubated with an fitCconjugated secondary antibody for 1 h. Cells in at least three wells on the plate were incubated with secondary antibody only, to determine the background fluorescence. nuclei were counterstained with 10 μg/ml hoechst 33342 (invitrogen). images of stained cells were acquired using an automated microscopy platform (inCell analyzer 1000, ge healthcare, little Chalfont, UK). ten random fields were acquired in each well using a 10× objective. images were analyzed using developer toolbox 1.7 software (ge healthcare). the effects of the hits from the primary screen were confirmed by retesting the compounds at a final concentration of 0.1, 1, 2.5, 5, and 10 μM, using the same protocol as in the primary screen. after 5 days, cells were fixed and stained for pluripotency markers ssea3 and oCt4. ten random fields were acquired in each well using a 10× objective. images were analyzed using developer toolbox 1.7 software.

    Saline:

    Article Title: High-content screening for chemical modulators of embryonal carcinoma cell differentiation and survival.
    Article Snippet: Primary and secondary screening assays for compound screening, ntera2 cells were plated at 2500 cells per well of a 96-well μclear flat-bottom plate (greiner Bio-one, stonehouse, UK). each compound was tested at three concentrations (0.1, 1, and 10 μM) and each concentration in triplicate wells. nine wells on each plate contained 0.1% dMso (vehicle) control, and three wells contained 10 μM all-trans retinoic acid as a differentiation control. after 5 days, the cells were washed once with dulbecco’s phosphate-buffered saline (pBs) without Ca2+ and Mg2+ and then fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 min. this was followed by washing the cells and blocking in pBs supplemented with 10% fCs (blocking buffer) for 1 h. Cells were then incubated with ssea3 primary antibody for 1 h, washed three times in pBs, and incubated with an fitCconjugated secondary antibody for 1 h. Cells in at least three wells on the plate were incubated with secondary antibody only, to determine the background fluorescence. nuclei were counterstained with 10 μg/ml hoechst 33342 (invitrogen). images of stained cells were acquired using an automated microscopy platform (inCell analyzer 1000, ge healthcare, little Chalfont, UK). ten random fields were acquired in each well using a 10× objective. images were analyzed using developer toolbox 1.7 software (ge healthcare). the effects of the hits from the primary screen were confirmed by retesting the compounds at a final concentration of 0.1, 1, 2.5, 5, and 10 μM, using the same protocol as in the primary screen. after 5 days, cells were fixed and stained for pluripotency markers ssea3 and oCt4. ten random fields were acquired in each well using a 10× objective. images were analyzed using developer toolbox 1.7 software.

    Blocking Assay:

    Article Title: High-content screening for chemical modulators of embryonal carcinoma cell differentiation and survival.
    Article Snippet: Primary and secondary screening assays for compound screening, ntera2 cells were plated at 2500 cells per well of a 96-well μclear flat-bottom plate (greiner Bio-one, stonehouse, UK). each compound was tested at three concentrations (0.1, 1, and 10 μM) and each concentration in triplicate wells. nine wells on each plate contained 0.1% dMso (vehicle) control, and three wells contained 10 μM all-trans retinoic acid as a differentiation control. after 5 days, the cells were washed once with dulbecco’s phosphate-buffered saline (pBs) without Ca2+ and Mg2+ and then fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 min. this was followed by washing the cells and blocking in pBs supplemented with 10% fCs (blocking buffer) for 1 h. Cells were then incubated with ssea3 primary antibody for 1 h, washed three times in pBs, and incubated with an fitCconjugated secondary antibody for 1 h. Cells in at least three wells on the plate were incubated with secondary antibody only, to determine the background fluorescence. nuclei were counterstained with 10 μg/ml hoechst 33342 (invitrogen). images of stained cells were acquired using an automated microscopy platform (inCell analyzer 1000, ge healthcare, little Chalfont, UK). ten random fields were acquired in each well using a 10× objective. images were analyzed using developer toolbox 1.7 software (ge healthcare). the effects of the hits from the primary screen were confirmed by retesting the compounds at a final concentration of 0.1, 1, 2.5, 5, and 10 μM, using the same protocol as in the primary screen. after 5 days, cells were fixed and stained for pluripotency markers ssea3 and oCt4. ten random fields were acquired in each well using a 10× objective. images were analyzed using developer toolbox 1.7 software.

    Incubation:

    Article Title: High-content screening for chemical modulators of embryonal carcinoma cell differentiation and survival.
    Article Snippet: Primary and secondary screening assays for compound screening, ntera2 cells were plated at 2500 cells per well of a 96-well μclear flat-bottom plate (greiner Bio-one, stonehouse, UK). each compound was tested at three concentrations (0.1, 1, and 10 μM) and each concentration in triplicate wells. nine wells on each plate contained 0.1% dMso (vehicle) control, and three wells contained 10 μM all-trans retinoic acid as a differentiation control. after 5 days, the cells were washed once with dulbecco’s phosphate-buffered saline (pBs) without Ca2+ and Mg2+ and then fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 min. this was followed by washing the cells and blocking in pBs supplemented with 10% fCs (blocking buffer) for 1 h. Cells were then incubated with ssea3 primary antibody for 1 h, washed three times in pBs, and incubated with an fitCconjugated secondary antibody for 1 h. Cells in at least three wells on the plate were incubated with secondary antibody only, to determine the background fluorescence. nuclei were counterstained with 10 μg/ml hoechst 33342 (invitrogen). images of stained cells were acquired using an automated microscopy platform (inCell analyzer 1000, ge healthcare, little Chalfont, UK). ten random fields were acquired in each well using a 10× objective. images were analyzed using developer toolbox 1.7 software (ge healthcare). the effects of the hits from the primary screen were confirmed by retesting the compounds at a final concentration of 0.1, 1, 2.5, 5, and 10 μM, using the same protocol as in the primary screen. after 5 days, cells were fixed and stained for pluripotency markers ssea3 and oCt4. ten random fields were acquired in each well using a 10× objective. images were analyzed using developer toolbox 1.7 software.

    Fluorescence:

    Article Title: High-content screening for chemical modulators of embryonal carcinoma cell differentiation and survival.
    Article Snippet: Primary and secondary screening assays for compound screening, ntera2 cells were plated at 2500 cells per well of a 96-well μclear flat-bottom plate (greiner Bio-one, stonehouse, UK). each compound was tested at three concentrations (0.1, 1, and 10 μM) and each concentration in triplicate wells. nine wells on each plate contained 0.1% dMso (vehicle) control, and three wells contained 10 μM all-trans retinoic acid as a differentiation control. after 5 days, the cells were washed once with dulbecco’s phosphate-buffered saline (pBs) without Ca2+ and Mg2+ and then fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 min. this was followed by washing the cells and blocking in pBs supplemented with 10% fCs (blocking buffer) for 1 h. Cells were then incubated with ssea3 primary antibody for 1 h, washed three times in pBs, and incubated with an fitCconjugated secondary antibody for 1 h. Cells in at least three wells on the plate were incubated with secondary antibody only, to determine the background fluorescence. nuclei were counterstained with 10 μg/ml hoechst 33342 (invitrogen). images of stained cells were acquired using an automated microscopy platform (inCell analyzer 1000, ge healthcare, little Chalfont, UK). ten random fields were acquired in each well using a 10× objective. images were analyzed using developer toolbox 1.7 software (ge healthcare). the effects of the hits from the primary screen were confirmed by retesting the compounds at a final concentration of 0.1, 1, 2.5, 5, and 10 μM, using the same protocol as in the primary screen. after 5 days, cells were fixed and stained for pluripotency markers ssea3 and oCt4. ten random fields were acquired in each well using a 10× objective. images were analyzed using developer toolbox 1.7 software.

    Staining:

    Article Title: High-content screening for chemical modulators of embryonal carcinoma cell differentiation and survival.
    Article Snippet: Primary and secondary screening assays for compound screening, ntera2 cells were plated at 2500 cells per well of a 96-well μclear flat-bottom plate (greiner Bio-one, stonehouse, UK). each compound was tested at three concentrations (0.1, 1, and 10 μM) and each concentration in triplicate wells. nine wells on each plate contained 0.1% dMso (vehicle) control, and three wells contained 10 μM all-trans retinoic acid as a differentiation control. after 5 days, the cells were washed once with dulbecco’s phosphate-buffered saline (pBs) without Ca2+ and Mg2+ and then fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 min. this was followed by washing the cells and blocking in pBs supplemented with 10% fCs (blocking buffer) for 1 h. Cells were then incubated with ssea3 primary antibody for 1 h, washed three times in pBs, and incubated with an fitCconjugated secondary antibody for 1 h. Cells in at least three wells on the plate were incubated with secondary antibody only, to determine the background fluorescence. nuclei were counterstained with 10 μg/ml hoechst 33342 (invitrogen). images of stained cells were acquired using an automated microscopy platform (inCell analyzer 1000, ge healthcare, little Chalfont, UK). ten random fields were acquired in each well using a 10× objective. images were analyzed using developer toolbox 1.7 software (ge healthcare). the effects of the hits from the primary screen were confirmed by retesting the compounds at a final concentration of 0.1, 1, 2.5, 5, and 10 μM, using the same protocol as in the primary screen. after 5 days, cells were fixed and stained for pluripotency markers ssea3 and oCt4. ten random fields were acquired in each well using a 10× objective. images were analyzed using developer toolbox 1.7 software.

    Microscopy:

    Article Title: High-content screening for chemical modulators of embryonal carcinoma cell differentiation and survival.
    Article Snippet: Primary and secondary screening assays for compound screening, ntera2 cells were plated at 2500 cells per well of a 96-well μclear flat-bottom plate (greiner Bio-one, stonehouse, UK). each compound was tested at three concentrations (0.1, 1, and 10 μM) and each concentration in triplicate wells. nine wells on each plate contained 0.1% dMso (vehicle) control, and three wells contained 10 μM all-trans retinoic acid as a differentiation control. after 5 days, the cells were washed once with dulbecco’s phosphate-buffered saline (pBs) without Ca2+ and Mg2+ and then fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 min. this was followed by washing the cells and blocking in pBs supplemented with 10% fCs (blocking buffer) for 1 h. Cells were then incubated with ssea3 primary antibody for 1 h, washed three times in pBs, and incubated with an fitCconjugated secondary antibody for 1 h. Cells in at least three wells on the plate were incubated with secondary antibody only, to determine the background fluorescence. nuclei were counterstained with 10 μg/ml hoechst 33342 (invitrogen). images of stained cells were acquired using an automated microscopy platform (inCell analyzer 1000, ge healthcare, little Chalfont, UK). ten random fields were acquired in each well using a 10× objective. images were analyzed using developer toolbox 1.7 software (ge healthcare). the effects of the hits from the primary screen were confirmed by retesting the compounds at a final concentration of 0.1, 1, 2.5, 5, and 10 μM, using the same protocol as in the primary screen. after 5 days, cells were fixed and stained for pluripotency markers ssea3 and oCt4. ten random fields were acquired in each well using a 10× objective. images were analyzed using developer toolbox 1.7 software.

    Software:

    Article Title: High-content screening for chemical modulators of embryonal carcinoma cell differentiation and survival.
    Article Snippet: Primary and secondary screening assays for compound screening, ntera2 cells were plated at 2500 cells per well of a 96-well μclear flat-bottom plate (greiner Bio-one, stonehouse, UK). each compound was tested at three concentrations (0.1, 1, and 10 μM) and each concentration in triplicate wells. nine wells on each plate contained 0.1% dMso (vehicle) control, and three wells contained 10 μM all-trans retinoic acid as a differentiation control. after 5 days, the cells were washed once with dulbecco’s phosphate-buffered saline (pBs) without Ca2+ and Mg2+ and then fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde for 15 min. this was followed by washing the cells and blocking in pBs supplemented with 10% fCs (blocking buffer) for 1 h. Cells were then incubated with ssea3 primary antibody for 1 h, washed three times in pBs, and incubated with an fitCconjugated secondary antibody for 1 h. Cells in at least three wells on the plate were incubated with secondary antibody only, to determine the background fluorescence. nuclei were counterstained with 10 μg/ml hoechst 33342 (invitrogen). images of stained cells were acquired using an automated microscopy platform (inCell analyzer 1000, ge healthcare, little Chalfont, UK). ten random fields were acquired in each well using a 10× objective. images were analyzed using developer toolbox 1.7 software (ge healthcare). the effects of the hits from the primary screen were confirmed by retesting the compounds at a final concentration of 0.1, 1, 2.5, 5, and 10 μM, using the same protocol as in the primary screen. after 5 days, cells were fixed and stained for pluripotency markers ssea3 and oCt4. ten random fields were acquired in each well using a 10× objective. images were analyzed using developer toolbox 1.7 software.



    Similar Products

    96
    Greiner Bio flat bottom 384 well plates
    Flat Bottom 384 Well Plates, supplied by Greiner Bio, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/%CE%BCclear+flat-bottom+plate/Microplate+384+Well+Ps+F-Bottom+%CE%9Cclear/pmc12846741-89-25-28
    Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    flat bottom 384 well plates - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    96/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    95
    Greiner Bio clear flat bottom plates
    Clear Flat Bottom Plates, supplied by Greiner Bio, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 95/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/%CE%BCclear+flat-bottom+plate/Microplate+384+Well+Ps+%CE%9Cclear+Black/pm41422091-276-24-27
    Average 95 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    clear flat bottom plates - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    95/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Greiner Bio black cellstar 96-well plates with a μclear flat bottom
    Black Cellstar 96 Well Plates With A μclear Flat Bottom, supplied by Greiner Bio, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/%CE%BCclear+flat-bottom+plate/96+well+plates/pm40227055-120-24-26
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    black cellstar 96-well plates with a μclear flat bottom - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Greiner Bio 96-well black-walled plate with a μclear flat bottom
    96 Well Black Walled Plate With A μclear Flat Bottom, supplied by Greiner Bio, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/%CE%BCclear+flat-bottom+plate/96+well+plates/pm39996761-133-28-30
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    96-well black-walled plate with a μclear flat bottom - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Greiner Bio 384 well plate μclear flat-bottom
    384 Well Plate μclear Flat Bottom, supplied by Greiner Bio, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/%CE%BCclear+flat-bottom+plate/96+well+plates/pmc11297284-393-16-17
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    384 well plate μclear flat-bottom - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    90
    Greiner Bio 384-well μclear flat bottom plate
    384 Well μclear Flat Bottom Plate, supplied by Greiner Bio, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/product/%CE%BCclear+flat-bottom+plate/96+well+plates/pm37754682-75-10-13
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    384-well μclear flat bottom plate - by Bioz Stars, 2026-09
    90/100 stars
      Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results